Thursday, June 26, 2014

MI Master Policy News; FHA's LEAP Difficulties



 

Jeff Lipes notes, "Statistics are like bikinis, they reveal some very interesting information, but hide the most interesting parts." The ABA reports community banks now spend about 15% of revenue on compliance to meet regulatory requirements. True, the cost of doing business for a regulated business does not drive Congress or the CFPB decision-making, but these costs are passed on to the consumer - who can have quite a voice.

On the MI-front, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have announced an effective implementation date of October 1, 2014 for new mortgage insurance master policies. U.S. Mortgage Insurers (USMI) noted that, "New master policies provide assurances about the consistent handling and payment of claims and bring greater transparency to contractual protections for lenders and investors with regard to "representations and warranties." This important step forward is a component of meaningful reforms that will help ensure that the industry maintains a strong financial position and meets its obligations." 

Back in March this commentary had a quote from Claudia J. Merkle, an EVP and Chief of Insurance Operations at NMI Holdings, Inc. (National MI) in response to comments about standardized MI master policies, "I'd like to pass along an important distinction about National MI. A good analogy: BMW and Yugo are the same in that they are both cars, but there is a lot of variation between the two. I encourage lenders to be skeptical of any MI firm that openly brags that we are all the same. I have personally been involved with the GSEs and the FHFA through the National MI master policy development process, and although some firms would like to have the market believe that all of the policies are the same, there are some significant differences that will either save or cost the lender real dollars. Later this year, the new MI master policies will be similar to the extent that they all contain the general principles required by FHFA and GSEs, but they are not mandated to be entirely identical." 

I received this note from the Northeast: "Our company strives to comply with the myriad of rules and regulations with which we are faced. We are having difficulty paying our recertification fee on FHA LEAP. Do you know of any tricks to it? It is like the FHA's version of the Obamacare website fiasco." I don't know any tricks, but Karen Garner of the Collingwood Group certainly has the background and current situation nailed down. "For what it is worth, you are in good company.  Everyone is having problems.  The good news is that FHA knows it so the worry over being sanctioned should go away. In my experience the FHA will give guidance about extending the recert IF its staff doesn't get it up and working soon. As I understand it management hopes to have things fixed by the end of June (next week) so if it is not fixed then yes I am sure they will. They have already extended the deadline before because LEAP was not out so I think they will do it again. But to be safe, my suggestion is to try and log in and if you get an error message, print the screen.  I've been in compliance over 30 years and we are all about the paper trail. That way if anything should happen you would have evidence that you tried and it was their system that did not work." Thank you Karen, and here is what has been sent by the FHA: 

"As most lenders are aware, FHA's Lender Electronic Assessment Portal (LEAP) version 3.0 was deployed on May 27, 2014.  While FHA is enthusiastic about the long-term business transformation benefits of LEAP 3.0, we are aware that users are currently having difficulty executing some functions in the system. FHA is working diligently to resolve these issues, and hopes to have LEAP operating at its full capacity as quickly as possible. Lenders facing access issues, particularly with the functionality for providing access to independent public accountants for purposes of recertification functions, should visit the "IPA Registration and Assignment Instructions" on the LEAP information page. For access issues related to certifying officials or other lender functions in LEAP and/or FHA Connection, lenders should access the LEAP 3.0 User Manual. The FHA Connection User Guide can be found here

"FHA is also aware of difficulties lenders are encountering in LEAP when adding new branches, making changes to existing branches, and changing Cash Flow Accounts.  FHA is highly focused on correcting these issues, and hopes to have these functions working properly very soon. Finally, FHA is aware of the complications that some lenders have faced in submitting their annual re-certifications in LEAP.  Many of these challenges have now been addressed, and lenders should continue working to meet the June 30 deadline for submitting their recertification packages. Visit the LEAP Information Page or the online resource."

 Donna Beinfeld with Donnashi writes, "The LEAP (Lender Electronic Assessment Portal) will be used not only for new mortgagee applications, but also for the re-certification process and other HUD lender assessment activities. I spoke to a member of the HUD Resource Center and he indicated they are aware of the issues with new applications not being processed because of an error on their end. For lenders who have pending new mortgagee applications the process is as follows. Call the HUD Resource Center (800-225-5342), indicate you are a lender and then press 4, which is for all other questions. They do not have a specific extension for LEAP related questions and issues. The Resource Center individual will take your name, company name, etc., and forward your call to a LEAP specialist. The LEAP specialist can tell you the status of your application. Since payment of your application fee, and other fees related to FHA loans once you are approved are handled through Pay.gov, I highly recommend a company applying to work with HUD registers with www.Pay.gov before they start this process. The information available to the lending community related to LEAP can be found here, or for a PowerPoint on the program go to ApprovedMortgagees.  

 Thomson Reuters reported that Auction.com, the largest online real estate dealer in the US, will stop selling residential mortgage loans. "The company, which made a name selling distressed properties after the financial crisis, came under fire last year in connection with a lawsuit over RMBS loans sold on the site. RMBS bondholders sued Nationstar Mortgage Holdings for selling roughly US$150m in soured securitized home loans on Auction.com without notifying them. EVP Rick Sharga said that the decision to exit the residential loan market was unconnected to the case, which was settled out of court, and based on a desire for growth instead. IFR reports, "It's not that this doesn't work online," he said. "It's just a question of where the best return is...Auctions.com has also been selling bulk pools of soured residential and commercial loans from servicers in an eBay-type auction. It will continue selling commercial real estate loan and properties. It said it sold more than US$7bn in real estate online last year. Auction.com was valued at US$1.2bn in March after Google Capital made a US$50m investment in the platform. Others shareholders include Starwood Capital Group, Starwood Property Trust, Stone Point Capital and funds managed by affiliates of Fortress Investment Group."

 Turning to rates, it almost seems that regardless of the news, rates seem quite comfortable where they are - surprising given the bad news out yesterday. Durable Goods Orders for May fell -1.0%, the first drop since January. And Q1 GDP, in its final number, was -2.9%, below the expected fall of -1.8% and down from second revision of -1.0%. This was the biggest loss since Q1 2009. Analysts were quick to slice and dice the numbers, and when the dust settled it turned out a portion of these dismal numbers can be explained away due to weather and Obamacare! Nonetheless, rates improved slightly with the 10-yr closing at 2.56% and agency MBS prices better by about .125.

 
http://globalhomefinance.blogspot.com

No comments:

Post a Comment