Suddenly the entire industry seems interested in three things:
using the Federal Home Loan Banks as a pseudo-warehouse line, jumbo deals, and
force-place insurance. Regarding this last issue, Kate Berry with American
Banker wrote an article of interest: "FHFA Should Sue Banks on
Force-Placed Insurance: Watchdog". "The Federal Housing Finance
Agency should sue force-placed insurers and large banks for inflating prices
and generating losses for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the agency's inspector general says.
Fannie and Freddie suffered $158 million in 'financial harm' in 2012 alone from
reimbursing servicers for 'excessively priced' force-placed insurance. The
government-sponsored enterprises reimbursed servicers for $327 million in
force-placed insurance premiums last year and for $587 million in premiums from
2009 to 2011, the report found. The 24-page report by the inspector general
recommends that the FHFA assess whether to sue insurers and banks to recover
damages. The FHFA has agreed to complete an assessment on whether to litigate
within a year. Two insurers, Assurant Inc. (AIZ) and QBE Holdings, write more
than 90% of force-placed insurance coverage. They priced premiums paid by the
GSEs that were 79% above what was considered 'reasonable' to cover claims, the
inspector general's report found. Yet the FHFA, as the conservator of Fannie
and Freddie, never determined whether to sue to recover damages. FHFA officials
'cited competing priorities, such as finalizing other financial settlements, as
the reason for not completing such an assessment,' the report found.
Force-placed insurance made headlines in 2011 when mortgage borrowers were hit
with hefty premiums, usually after they defaulted and went into foreclosure.
The hazard insurance is purchased by the servicer or creditor when a struggling
homeowner fails to maintain coverage on the property."
So let's dig into this a little. The Federal Housing Finance
Agency Inspector General conducted an audit on the lender-placed insurance
premiums Freddie & Fannie paid on homes that have defaulted in the past
several years. In the audit, the FHFA IG found the GSEs suffered $158M of
financial harm due to excessively priced lender-placed insurance coverage in
2012 alone. The report states the GSEs paid
$914M of insurance premiums during the years 2009-2012. As part of the audit
findings, the FHFA IG recommends the FHFA sue the servicers and insurers to
recover damages related to the excessive premiums that were charged. Those
"in the know" think that if the FHFA were to attempt to recover
damages related to excessive fees on lender-placed insurance, we should not expect
any potential litigation to be a significant hit to the large banks involved in
servicing large delinquent portfolios. But it could have a material impact on
special servicers that have a less diversified revenue base and service highly
delinquent GSE mortgage portfolios.
Saturday's commentary had a note from an LO about calibrating
VA fees with other programs. I received several notes to the contrary.
"What am I missing something here? Is the originator forced to provide VA
loans? If someone doesn't like the program, don't participate in the program.
VA does not say you cannot charge, it says the Vet cannot pay. The seller,
realtors, and originators are allowed to cover any fees they want to cover.
Maybe LOs don't make as much, but the program is a good one and has been around
for a long time. The program is pretty much as it has always been. Don't like
it, don't do it."
And Theresa Springer, CGA, CAPS and Senior Loan Officer and
Sales Manager with Eagle Home Mortgage writes, "All I can say to that Arkansas
LO that wrote in on VA loans today, is 'SUCK IT UP.' I write many VA loans
monthly along with my other loans and if the seller is not going to pay those
non-allowables, our company surely will without a peep, so they can send their
VA clients our way. These men and women help to keep us free so we CAN write
loans and argue with the CFPB and complain about all our issues in a free press
and do what we want in our lives FREELY. I make enough profit on my other
loans to cover all my VA loans and then some very nicely, especially with
selling the SRP."
Finally, Guy Keith contributed, "The 'intent' of the VA
loan program is to 'help' the veteran, who has served our country and helped
preserve our freedoms at the risk of their lives, to buy a home. The
VA program is one of the rewards for their service to our country. This is not
a program to make it easier for lenders and affiliates to make their fees.
The VA decided that they did not want the veteran to pay certain fees in the
loan process. The VA no-no came about where the veteran had no down payment and
the seller paid the closing costs which allowed the veteran to buy a home with
no money. Many veterans coming home from military service don't have
money for a down payment. The military is not known for paying exorbitant
salaries to its soldiers. So helping the veteran buy a home needed to have
something in it to help them. Thus the VA no-no and the limitation on
what the veteran can pay.
"Forward to today's home market and the VA no-no does not work
nearly as well since there is a shortage of homes compared to the number of
buyers. Because of this, sellers won't pay for anything right now. That
being the case, the only way the non-allowables can be paid it by the lender
through premium pricing. It may not seem fair to the lender, but the market
drives these things. So in the short term, the veteran pays a slightly higher
interest rate (although in some states the 1% the veteran can pay usually is
more than enough to pay the non-allowables), but the offset is that their
closing costs are several thousand dollars less. They pay a higher
interest rate, but the market is driving this based on supply and demand.
VA rates are always among the lowest available and with no mortgage insurance,
even with a slightly higher interest rate to cover these costs; their payment
is lower than with any other loan program. Since a termite report and clearance
is required on all VA loans, the loan officer needs to communicate with the
real estate agent so they know this when they make an offer. This can
definitely be an issue if the seller does not want to pay it. But again, the
termite requirement is to protect the veteran. We may not agree with some
of the requirements, but if that's the case, then don't do VA loans."
Scores of lenders are contemplating doing non-QM loans.
One of the major concerns is the potential for future liabilities. "Three
companies, Strategic Compliance Partners ('SCP'), VidVerify and Litigation
Guard, have laid the groundwork for a solution to assist both borrowers and
lenders in overcoming the potential risks posed by the new regulations. The
concept, says Ari Karen, SCP's CEO and a principal of the Offit Kurman law
firm, 'is basic.' 'The major difference between NonQM and QM loans is that new
rules create liabilities on loans that in reality may not necessarily be
riskier simply because they fall into the NonQM box. By developing a process
which marginalizes and manages that liability up front, we remove the obstacles
associated with NonQM or borderline QM loans.'
"Litigation Guard's QMReview 'closes the gaps left
by traditional origination, processing and underwriting protocols that often
result in claims against lenders. QMReview educates the borrower at all phases
of the loan process, improving the borrower's ability to properly choose a
loan, and 'unequivocally ensures that borrowers understand exactly what they
are getting and why,' says Karen. It provides safeguards to ensure that lenders
and borrowers are 'on the same page throughout the loan process.' Further, the
process provides an automated residual income analysis and decision algorithm,
relying upon the borrower's actual net income, savings, and realistic spending
habits, to determine the borrower's ability to repay. According to Karen, the
innovative QMReview process 'will not only minimize the liability for
lenders - it will result in a better experience for borrowers and overall
better and safer loans.'
"From a purely legal perspective QMReview relies upon the
concept of an independently based and alternative assessment to demonstrate a
lenders' good faith belief that the borrower can repay the loan. This
assessment is performed in three distinct phases. First, there is an
independent certification performed by SCP that the lender maintains sufficient
compliance infrastructures. Second, a borrower receives a series of short
videos (created by VidVerify and reviewed by SCP) that present information in
an understandable manner to assist him or her in making educated decisions and
asking the right questions throughout the loan process. Viewership is
tracked to ensure that the borrower has received and reviewed the information.
Third, an automated borrower interactive residual income analysis documents and
confirms the ability to repay. It also utilizes creates documentation
that prevents potential misrepresentations, omissions, steering, and other
harms that have been common fodder for lender lawsuits." For more
information contact Chris Tiso (CEO of Litigation Guard), and no,
this is not a paid ad.
Flipping over to the markets, there is no mystery about what the
Fed is going to buy in terms of securities. If you ever want to know, check it
out for yourself at the Fed's schedule. It is
pretty hard to attribute any market move to the Fed's activities when it
publishes, in advance, what it is going to buy! The question is more like,
"Will originators and MBS holders lock/originate/sell what the Fed wants
to buy?"
We do have a lot of news this week, along with the bond markets
closing early Thursday and being closed entirely on Friday. Today we'll have
the Chicago Purchasing Manager's survey and Pending Home Sales. Tomorrow we'll
have some Manufacturing and Construction Spending numbers. Wednesday we'll have
the MBA lock numbers (just ask your lock desk now and spoil the surprise) along
with the ADP employment data and Challenger Job Cuts numbers, and Factory
Orders. Thursday all ---- breaks loose! The markets are closing early, but
ahead of that we have the Trade Balance, weekly Initial Jobless Claims, and
change in Nonfarm Payrolls, Unemployment rate, and hourly earnings. Friday the
10-yr closed at 2.53% and in the early going today we're back to 2.51% and
agency MBS prices are a shade better.
The
last day of the quarter and half way through the year. A short week but a lot
of data and Fed speak; the stock market will close at 1:00 on Thursday and
markets closed on Friday. In the meantime there are a number of key reports and
the June employment data to work through, kind of like cramming for a final
exam. Interest rate markets started slightly better this morning with stock
indexes a little lower. Not much news over the weekend; the turmoil in Iraq
spreading into Syria, the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) expanding
its foothold in Syria after recent gains in Iraq. Not much reaction to the
mid-east mess in our markets, but eyeballs are focused on the events as they
unfold.
The
DJIA opened -41, NASADAQ -1, S&P -2; 10 yr 2.53% unch and 30 yr MBS prices
+6 bps frm Friday’s close.
The
first report this week; at 9:45 the June Chicago purchasing mgrs. index,
expected at 64.0 frm 65.5 in May, as reported the index was a little lower, at
62.6. There was no noticeable reaction to the weaker index, still well over 50
and still implies expansion. With employment data on the horizon it will take a
huge miss on the rest of this week’s data to move markets.
The
second report of the week at 10:00; NAR’s May pending home sales (contracts
signed but not yet closed), was expected to up 1.0% frm April’s increase of
0.4%. A surprising increase of 6.1%; NAR saying sales increases are being
fueled by an increase in inventories.
We
don’t expect any significant changes in the stock or bond markets until
Wednesday if Janet Yellen rocks the boat in her speech at the IMF conference;
most likely she won’t drop any tape bombs though. Thursday’s June employment
report is as usual elephant in the room. The status of the economy continues to
roil markets, interest rates at low levels suggest the bond market is betting
on a weaker 2014 growth that most presently expect to be at about 3.0% to 3.5%;
the stock market is worrying but so far no mass selling. Uncertainty keeps
stock indexes from taking off in another run higher, the same uncertainty is
keeping stocks frm declining. Interest rates at these levels will need additional
assurance that the Fed will not increase rates early in 2015 as some Fed
officials are now thinking. That assurance will require continual weaker
economic outlooks. The initial reaction the stronger May pending home sales
already has pushed MS prices 6 bps lower than at 9:30 this morning.
This
Week’s Economic Calendar:
Monday:
9:45
am June Chicago Purchasing Mgrs. index (64.0 frm 65.5 in May)
10:00
am May pending home sales (+1.0% frm +0.4% in April)
Tuesday:
10:00
am June ISM manufacturing index (55.6 frm 55.4 in May)
May
construction spending (+0.5% frm +0.2% in April)
No
Time June auto and truck sales (+16.4 mil frm 16.8 mil in May)
Wednesday:
7:00
am MBA mortgage apps
8:15
am ADP Private jobs in June (+213K, May 179K)
10:00
am May factory orders (-0.3%, +0.7% in April)
11:00
am Janet Yellen at IMF conference
Thursday:
8:30
am weekly jobless claims (314K +2 K)
June
unemployment rate (6.3% unchanged frm May)
NFP
jobs (+211K)
Private
jobs (210K)
Avg.
hourly earnings (+0.2%)
May
US trade deficit (-$-45.1B)
10:00
am June ISM services sector index (56.2 frm 56.3 in May)
1:00
pm Markets close
PRICES
@ 10:20 AM
10
yr note:-1/32 2.54% unch
5
yr note:-1/32 (3 bp) 1.65% +1 bp
2
Yr note: unch 0.47% unch
30
yr bond: +4/32 (12 bp) 3.36% -0.5%
Libor
Rates: 1 mo 0.151%; 3 mo 0.234%; 6 mo 0.326%; 1 yr 0.545%
30
yr FNMA 4.0 July: @9:30 106.03 +6 bp (-6 bp frm 9:30 Friday) (-9 bp on 3.5
coupon)
15
yr FNMA 3.0 July: @9:30 103.79 +13 bp (+7 bp frm 9:30 Friday)
30
yr GNMA 4.0 July: @9:30 106.72 +8 bp (-7 bp frm 9:30 Friday)
Dollar/Yen:
101.44 +0.02 yen
Dollar/Euro:
$1.3660 +$0.0011
Gold:
$1315.20 -$4.80
Crude
Oil: $105.57 -$0.17
DJIA:
16,866.77 +14.93
NASDAQ:
4408.81 +10.88
S&P
500: 1963.69 +2.73
http://globalhomefinance.blogspot.com