(Thanks to several readers who
sent this note from Santa along.)
I was going to deliver presents
on the 25th of December as usual, but due to hidden messages within TRID, I now
have to follow proper guidelines. That being said below is my revised holiday schedule.
Please make sure you submit
your initial list at least 14 days prior to the 25th. This list will be called
your IPD (Initial Present Disclosure.) You will then have 3 days before the
expiration to modify or change that list.
If you change your IPD wish
list, my EDT (Elf Disclosure Team) will send you a COCPL (Change of
Circumstance Present List) which must have a valid reason such as, "I no
longer want a waffle maker, but would like a healthy shake maker instead."
At that point, once everything
is confirmed, we will issue you a final SPD (Santa Present Disclosure) which
will go out to everyone immediately, including closers and funders. Yours will
go out 24-48 hours after others. At that point, you have 3 days to decide if
you want your presents or decline.
Then I will mount my sleigh and
deliver the presents. You will have to wait 3 more days to open your presents,
but if you're not in a NEW home, you will have 3 more days to return the
presents and forget the entire thing,
HO HO HO Happy Holidays,
SANTA
Yesterday I posted some USDA
rural housing updates, and received a couple notes from astute readers on a
couple errors. The upfront guarantee fee is not 2%, as was reported in a
mortgage publication. The fee is currently 2.75%. And the same article
reported that, regarding the maximum legal note rate, one can round the USDA
fee up to the highest quarter. Currently, the USDA fee is
allowed to be rounded up to the nearest quarter of one percent. If a
lender locks the loan above the maximum legal note rate the loan is not
eligible to be insured. Here is guidance from the USDA 3555 Handbook:
"The lender and the borrower are free to negotiate any mutually acceptable
fixed interest rate, as long as it does not exceed the interest rate cap
established by the Agency. This cap is 100 basis points (1.00 percentage
points) over the following: Current Fannie Mae yield for 90-day delivery
(actual/actual) for 30-year fixed rate conventional loans, rounded up to the
nearest one-quarter of 1 percent. The Fannie Mae website can be used to confirm acceptable
interest rates."
My cat Myrtle observed
that if we aren't there already, ever so slowly the residential lending
industry approaches the point where more people regulate it, audit it, survey
it, and provide vendor services than actually do the lending. There are
some that hope the CFPB will make an announcement in the next few days
regarding TRID and loans, perhaps specifically non-agency loans to help
alleviate the issues the industry is having - it would be nice to think that
the last thing that the CFPB is wants is to be universally thought of as the
cause of bringing residential lending to its knees.
"The share of
mortgage-related home sales that took longer than expected to close increased
slightly in November compared with the previous month, according to results
from the latest Campbell/Inside Mortgage Finance HousingPulse Tracking Survey.
The uptick in the share of delayed closings and the total time mortgage-related
transactions took to close suggests that new disclosure requirements from
the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that took effect in early October had
an impact on the housing market. However, the impact appears to be limited
as the majority of mortgage-related home sales continued to close on time under
the CFPB's Truth in Lending Act/Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
Integrated Disclosure (TRID) rule."
Questions of how
violations can be cured are being hotly debated. Theoretically TRID mistakes
are TIL violations and as we all know violating TIL is no joke with fines of
thousands per day. Seeing what is happening in residential lending Dan
Goldstein penned a story about how the "New Rules to Protect Home Buyers are Starting to Add Delays
and Costs."
Industry vet Joe
Garrett asks, "TRID gives borrowers three days to think about whether
they want to proceed with the mortgage or not. I guess the idea is that they'll
have plenty of time to ask questions and read everything. Do borrowers actually
do this? On refinances, how often does this actually happen? Or is this a
solution to a non-existent problem?"
Recently this commentary
noted that a sizeable and growing percentage of loans, especially jumbo loans,
were being rejected by investors. The question among lenders is naturally,
"Why?" The themes as to what the problems/violations are include
calculation issues. From seemingly small stuff like how to round the results of
various fields to more complex closing and financing calculations - there are
many new calculations that have been created - all of which create an
opportunity for error.
The forms are a big one.
Many of the fields needed to be dynamic to be able to hold the proper number of
fields and/or amount of information. Because the permutations of possible rate,
fee, product, etc. outcomes go into the thousands, I am hearing stories of form
failures (not enough columns, data going into the wrong fields, etc.).
Chase posted a TRID FAQ to help answer policy and procedure questions.
Clients of Digital Risk Clayton could contact them as they are right in the
middle of this since many non-agency loans that aren't going into a bank
portfolio go through them.
And Wells Fargo
informed its correspondent clients on common defect trends it has observed for
loans regulated by the TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosure (TRID) rule. (This
is meant as a summary; for specific details see Wells' actual announcement.)
Wells developed a TRID best practices sheet for addressing common suspense
issues - talk to your Wells rep about obtaining a copy.
Common Closing
Disclosure (CD) errors include the CD missing (all copies of the CD
disclosed to borrowers must be included in the closed loan package), and CDs
being used as a communication tool between settlement agents and lenders and
not necessarily disclosed to the consumer(s). The final CD signed and dated at
Closing is missing - Wells considers the "final CD" the CD signed by
the borrower(s) at consummation.
Materially incomplete or
inaccurate CDs are being disclosed to consumers: a CD that is disclosed to a
consumer and is materially incomplete or inaccurate will likely result in
non-purchase. (As a reminder, regardless of who prepares the CD, the
creditor is responsible for the accuracy of all disclosures provided to the
borrower.)
Lender credits listed as negative
fees in the Borrower-Paid column of the CD. Lender credits used toward specific
fees in the transaction must be itemized under the "Paid by Others"
column and identified with an "L." Lump sum lender credits should be
shown in the Lender Credits field in section J. TOTAL CLOSING COSTS
(Borrower-Paid). HOA dues must be included in the Estimated Taxes, Insurance
and Assessments section of the final CD, when the information is known to the
lender prior to Closing.
Fees associated with the
transaction (including those paid for by the seller), must be reflected on the
borrower's CD, even if a separate seller's CD is provided. And Wells is seeing
that a Borrower's total Closing costs do not match - The J. TOTAL CLOSING COSTS
(Borrower-Paid) on page 2 and the Total Closing Costs (J) on page 3 of the CD
signed at closing must be consistent.
Common Loan Estimate
(LE) errors are similar. All copies of the LE disclosed to borrowers must
be included in the Closed. Wells will not accept a Loan where the LE was
provided to the consumer on or after the date the CD was issued. Any seller
credits, either lump sum or for specific fees, known at the time of delivery of
the LE, must be disclosed on the LE as a total amount. The LE DATE ISSUED field
must be completed in order to validate accuracy of the timing requirement.
Wells is seeing examples
where the initial LE was not disclosed within three business days of the REG Z
application date. Or the appraisal disclosure verbiage is missing from the
Other Considerations section. It must be included in the Other Considerations
section on page 3 of the LE. And the LOAN ID # field must be completed on page
1 of the LE. Another problem is that lender and/or mortgage broker (as
applicable) contact information is not complete. Email address(es) and phone
number(s) must be provided with other data required under "Additional
Information About This Loan" on page 3.
Wells reports that there
are other common errors. For example, the Application Date field is blank on
the Wells Fargo Funding Loan Submission. Regarding the Summary (LSS) - The Reg.
Z application date must be provided on the LSS (in addition to completing the
DATE ISSUED field on the LE) in order to validate accuracy of the timing
requirement.
Checks to borrowers must
be included in the Closed Loan Package to evidence the proper refund was made
within the required timeframe. The correspondent group is seeing tolerance
violations not supported by changed circumstance documentation, or changed
circumstance documents missing - they must be included in the Closed Loan
Package.
Turning our attention to
the bond markets & rates, Monday, market-wise, was a great example of
holiday trading: up some, down some, ending unchanged. Fed-watchers heard
Atlanta Fed President Lockhart say that he more likely sees a rate hike at
every other meeting than at every meeting. The market expects even fewer rate
hikes than that, looking for less than the four indicated by the FOMC's
"dot plots" Frankly I'm a little weary of the press talking about the
Fed. Give it a break!
Today we've had the third
look at the 3rd quarter's GDP (headline GDP was expected +1.9%, it
came in at +2.0%). Coming up is the FHFA Housing Price Index and November's
Existing Home Sales. We saw a 2.20% close Monday on the 10-year T-note, where
it's been pretty much all year and equaling Friday's close. This morning it
is waffling around 2.21% with agency MBS prices worse a smidge.
No comments:
Post a Comment