Thursday, February 27, 2014

Groups react to proposed Tax Changes; Chatter about "Subprime" loans - a misnomer

http://globalhomefinance.com


Hope springs eternal, right? As the residential lending industry wraps up a couple rough months tomorrow, everyone is hoping for a more robust March and April. They are basing this hope on the seasonality of the purchase business out there, and the hope that the worst of the winter storms are past. Few are banking on lower rates, lower costs to originate, or a big influx of HARP-related business. Others are repeating the mantra, "Hope is not a strategy," and are moving ahead with expansion & hiring plans, scaling back operations staff due to production predictions that were too optimistic, analyzing capital increases or decreases, and adjusting projections. Life goes on and people need home loans - just not as many industry-wide as a year ago.
News out of Congress regarding possible changes to the tax code certainly turned some heads out there. Here is a statement by National Association of Realtors President Steve Brown: "NAR supports reforms that promote economic growth, but we strongly oppose severely altering the rules that govern ownership and investment in real estate. Real estate powers almost one-fifth of the U.S. economy, employs more than 17 million Americans, and contributes a quarter of all federal and state tax revenue and as much as 70 percent of local taxes. We are extremely disappointed with several of the provisions contained in U.S. House Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp's tax reform draft released today, namely proposed limits on the mortgage interest deduction and capital gains, and the repeal of deductions for state and local property taxes. These proposed changes to the taxation of real estate will impact every single American, either directly or indirectly. NAR will carefully analyze the details of the Chairman's plan so we can best educate Congress and the public about how this plan would impact the owners, consumers, and producers of both residential and commercial real estate."

And Barbara Thompson, the Executive Director of NCSHA (National Council of State Housing Agencies) issued a statement on Chairman Camp's Tax Reform Discussion Draft. "On the one hand, we are pleased that House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp's tax reform discussion draft preserves the Low Income Housing Tax Credit, though we are still analyzing the impact the many changes the draft proposes would have on the program. On the other, we are deeply disappointed that the discussion draft eliminates the ability of states and localities to issue tax-exempt bonds to finance affordable housing by terminating private activity bond authority. This authority allows states and localities to issue bonds for affordable housing, student loans, energy projects, water facilities, transportation developments, and other vital uses. State Housing Finance Agencies (HFAs) issue tax-exempt Housing Bonds to finance affordable mortgages for first-time homebuyers and rental housing developments. Forty percent of all Housing Credit production annually is made possible by Housing Bonds. Both programs have a proven track record of success in providing affordable housing help to the growing number of lower income people who need it. We urge Congress to ensure that any tax reform plan it advances preserves and strengthens both of these essential programs."

The CFPB said it is making mortgage loan servicing a "significant priority" for itself as it plans to make sure servicers are actively reaching out to customers in default to try to help them. The regulator said they expect servicers to pay "exceptionally close attention" to servicing transfers and only use force-placed insurance "as a last resort." But what happens when you combine servicing and subprime loans? Here is a take from Reuters. The press loves to use the word "subprime" since it seems to incite the pubic and regulators, and the industry should do what it can to stop using the term. Borrowers who don't have sterling credit have always existed, and always will, and will always want to borrow money - a fact somehow lost on some reporters.


But the definition of the word has always been nebulous, especially when it is tied to a FICO score (much to the dismay of other credit score providers). And "inconsistent income" has always been a problem for self-employed borrowers, generally the group mentioned as left behind in the Ability to Repay movement. Forgotten are compensating factors, such as LTV or assets in the bank. When Wells Fargo announced its retail group extending credit to that segment, it never uttered that term, but somehow it garnered plenty of press in spite of dozens of other lenders offering similar products especially in the FHA segment. Even Bloomberg jumped on the bandwagon with the headline, "Subprime Called Safer Makes Comeback as 'Nonprime'" in a story highlighting NewLeaf Lending. But gosh, haven't we been through this "slide down the credit curve" before?

 "Gone are the days when lenders handed out mortgages without requiring documentation and down payments. Today's purveyors of subprime call the loans 'nonprime' and require as much as 30 percent down to safeguard their investment. And they see a big opportunity for growth as tougher federal lending standards shut out millions of Americans with poor credit from the mortgage market. You're going to have to make all types of loans, ones that conform to all the new standards and ones that don't, to keep powering the housing recovery," said Bill Dallas, CEO of Skyline Financial Corp. in Calabasas, California. "There needs to be a solution for people who don't fit in the box, and rebuilding nonprime lending is it."

About $3 billion of subprime mortgages were made in the first nine months of 2013, matching the year-earlier period, according to Inside Mortgage Finance. In 2005, subprime originations reached $625 billion. But even that number, combined with jumbo securitizations, is less than 5% of overall historical production. Most companies are doing what they can to avoid non-QM lending, but in my discussions with CEOs they admit that eventually, if the investor market improves for this product, they will take a hard look at it. And then instead of Household, Beneficial, and Associated, we'll be hearing names like Advancial Mortgage, Athas Capital Group, B of I Federal Bank, Citadel Servicing, Impac, LoanStream Mortgage, New Leaf Wholesale, New Penn Financial, Parkside Lending, Quick Funding, Union Bank, Virage, and Western Bancorp. Regardless, the industry, and the press, should not equate non-QM with subprime.

http://globalhomefinance.blogspot.com

No comments:

Post a Comment