"The latest news is that the
Washington Redskins are going to change their name because of all the
hatred, violence, and hostility associated with their name. From now on
they will be known simply as the Redskins." Things have not turned
violent in lending, as we're a pretty civilized bunch - but one never knows.
And some companies continue to hire and expand.
SWBC Mortgage, a company with a
25 year history in retail mortgage lending is expanding. SWBC
Mortgage is an approved Seller/Servicer with both FNMA and FHLMC and is a
GNMA issuer who delivers loans directly and retains servicing. It funded
in excess of $3 billion over the past year with 66% purchase production and is
interested in branch and acquisition opportunities across the country. SWBC
Mortgage offers a traditional retail mortgage banking model with local
processing and in-house underwriting and closing. SWBC Mortgage is a
wholly owned subsidiary of SWBC (Texas), a diversified financial services
company providing a wide range of insurance, mortgage, and investment services
to financial institutions, businesses, and families. With offices across the
country, and more than 1600 employees, the company has the financial strength
to succeed in today's mortgage environment. Contact Kevin Haycock at khaycock@swbc.com for
consideration.
A full service, independently
owned, direct lender is looking to grow its Retail production by consolidating
several smaller independent bankers into its organization. The
well-known lender, which wishes to remain anonymous, is a GNMA issuer as well
as a direct FNMA & Freddie Seller, services for all 3 agencies and is
licensed in 47 states. This company is looking to acquire well run Retail
branches from companies that cannot achieve economies of scale or from
independents looking for an exit strategy. Individual branches are welcome, as
well. All inquiries are directly to the company, not via intermediaries, and
will be held in strict confidence, beginning with execution of NDA. Send email
inquiries to MortgageOpportunities@hotmail.com.
With all the hurdles for
residential lenders, such as higher rates, higher loan-level price hits, QM,
the list goes on, the last thing it really needs is problems caused by the
shutdown. But we have them. The current partial government shutdown is the
12th such slowdown since 1980 (last 33 years). Of the previous 11, the
first 9 (occurring between late 1981 and late 1990) all lasted 3 days or
less. Only the 10th slowdown (starting in November 1995 and lasting 5
days) and the 11th slowdown (starting in December 1995 and lasting 21 days)
were longer in duration.
As was mentioned in the
commentary last week, "even with many aggregators temporarily waiving tax
transcript requirements (the signed 4506-T is pretty much mandatory), lenders
should remember that reps and warrants are still in place for the life of the
loan." KK writes, "I agree with this, but after being at the
Compliance Conference in D.C. and meeting with the fine folks at the CFPB, here
is what they said directly. 'Spoke with Paul Mondor CFPB at MBA Regulatory
Conference in DC. Per Paul, if all other aspects of Appendix Q are
met then third party income verification is not necessary for QM and Safe
Harbor status per ATR rule comment.' Scary!"
Lenders are doing what they can. First
Mortgage Corporation's president Clem Ziroli wrote that FM "Will waive
all late fees and will work (i.e., within our prescribed ability) with all
federal employees to ensure their home loans remain in good standing during the
government shutdown. FMC will do so until the federal government resumes
in a 'normal' fashion. Though FMC services primarily in the western
states, we're hoping others will join us."
"To help U.S. government
employees who have been furloughed due to the U.S. government shutdown," Chase
announced efforts to assist them. "The assistance will be in place
from October 11th through October 31st or until the
shutdown ends - whichever is sooner. Chase encourages its customers who are
employees of a U.S. federal agency and whose income has been affected by the
shutdown to call the company to discuss certain hardship programs Chase offers
and can activate based on individual circumstances. Chase's hardship
programs are used by customers broadly who have been affected by unemployment,
financial strain or natural disasters. In addition, for employees of affected
federal agencies whose paycheck was direct-deposited to their Chase accounts in
September 2013, Chase will automatically waive fees on their checking and
savings accounts that could be incurred as a result of a lower than expected
account balance."
Well, here's a bit of good news
for banks of more than $10 billion in assets, or independent mortgage banks. Effective
November 1, the CFPB will end its practice of having enforcement attorneys
regularly participate in examinations of supervised entities. The report
indicated that a CFPB spokeswoman attributed the change to an internal review
that aimed to improve the supervision process and found that having both
examiners and enforcement attorneys present at exams was not efficient. Not
efficient? One CEO wrote to me and used the term "goon squad." That
aside, the industry viewed having an attorney in the office as inhibiting free
and open communications between the CFPB and supervised entities. But before
everyone gets excited, it would be a serious mistake for any supervised institution
to read the change as signifying that the CFPB will become more lax in
exercising its supervisory authority. For more, check out AlwaysOnTheRecord.
Speaking of the CFPB, it, and the
Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) will be hosting two webinars on
October 16 and 17 from 2-3:30 PM ET to address outstanding questions under the
new mortgage rules. The October 16 session will address the servicing rules and
the October 17 session will address the origination rules. Although the
webinars were initially limited to MBA members, rumor has it that the sessions
will be open to the public and once the link becomes available, the CFPB will
post it on their website. In the meantime: MBAEducation.
Barry S. wrote to me last week
and said, "I have attended several webinars and I still haven't seen this
spelled out so I will assume others would like to know the exact calculation:
Mortgage banker (creditor) pays his loan officers a flat fee for each loan closed,
say $1000 each. Loan is originated by mortgage banker and then will be sold to
secondary market or held. Is the $1000 part of the 3% test? It would seem
by all accounts it isn't." James Brody, with American Mortgage Law
Group (jbrody@americanmlg.com) writes,
"You are correct that the flat fee would not be included in the 3% test
as it is a commission paid to a creditor's own loan officer. The CFPB has
stated in guidance docs that compensation paid by a creditor to an MLO that is
an employee of the creditor is to be excluded from points and fees for QM
purposes."
Two of the big banks in the U.S.
reported earnings on Friday. Chase and Wells are big indeed, and their
earnings reflect trends in lending. The two, and other big banks, have only
grown larger since the collapse of Lehman, the implosion of AIG and the folding
of the major US investment houses into super-sized bank holding companies.
According to Bloomberg, the six biggest banks in the US have increased
combined assets by 28% since 2007. The biggest banks have been prodded by
regulators to cut risk and raise capital in order to survive the next hiccup.
As such, the amount of capital at the 6 largest US banks has almost doubled
since 2008.
Wells
reported $1.6 billion in mortgage banking income for the third quarter, a 43
percent drop from the same period one year earlier, and it received $87 billion
worth of mortgage applications last quarter compared with $188 billion a year
ago. At JPMorgan, loan originations "only" fell 14 percent year over
year to $40.5 billion. Nevertheless, the nation's largest bank pulled down $705
million in income from mortgage banking during the quarter, a 13 percent
increase from the prior year. Commenting on the results, investment banker KBW
observed, "Overall, we view JPM's and WFC's mortgage banking results as
weaker than expected primarily based on the sharp declines in gain-on-sale
margins. We believe the read-across for the sector is moderately negative. Gain-on-sale
(GOS) margins were down quarter over quarter. JPM's GOS margin declined 118 bps
to 1.44% from 2.62%, and the net mortgage banking margin (which includes
expenses) fell 97 bps to 0.22% from 1.19%. We believe the weakness reflects the
decline in mortgage application volume, which fell 38% to $40.4 billion from
$65 billion. WFC's GOS margin declined 79 bps to 1.42% from 2.21%. WFC
experienced a similar 40% QoQ decline in mortgage applications."
KBW goes one, "WFC's
unclosed application pipeline at quarter end was $35 billion, down 44% QoQ. The
declines in application volume suggest that interest rate lock commitments were
also down QoQ. JPM's mortgage origination volume of $40.5 billion was down 17%
QoQ, while WFC's origination volume was down 28.6% to $80 billion. We view the
decline at WFC as relatively in line with industry expectations. The Mortgage
Bankers Association (MBA) is currently forecasting that industry volumes will
decline by 25% QoQ. The declines in mortgage applications for both companies
were close to the 41% decrease in average weekly applications that we saw in
the unadjusted MBA index during 3Q. JPM noted that its purchase originations
were up 57% from the prior year and 15% QoQ."
If you'd like some input on the
flood insurance rules, now is your chance (through December 10).The proposed rule is being issued by the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Farm Credit Administration, the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union Administration
and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. It would implement certain
provisions of the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012
(Biggert-Waters) with respect to private flood insurance, the escrow of flood
insurance payments, and the forced-placement of flood insurance. Separate from
the agencies' joint proposal, Biggert-Waters also mandated other changes to the
National Flood Insurance Program.
The proposed rule would require
that regulated lending institutions accept private flood insurance as defined
in Biggert-Waters to satisfy the mandatory purchase requirements and solicits
comment on whether the agencies should adopt additional regulations on the
acceptance of flood insurance policies issued by private insurers. In addition,
the proposal would require regulated lending institutions to escrow payments
and fees for flood insurance for any new or outstanding loans secured by
residential improved real estate or a mobile home, not including business,
agricultural and commercial loans, unless the institutions qualify for the
statutory exception. There are new and revised sample notice forms and clauses
concerning the availability of private flood insurance coverage and the escrow
requirement, and the possibility it would clarify that regulated lending
institutions have the authority to charge a borrower for the cost of
force-placed flood insurance coverage beginning on the date on which the
borrower's coverage lapsed or became insufficient and would stipulate the
circumstances under which a lender must terminate force-placed flood insurance
coverage and refund payments to a borrower.
Here
is the formal notice. One can also go
to one of the agencies - for example: look under recent updates here. One may
submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal "regulations.gov":
Go to Regulations, enter
"Docket ID OCC-2013-0015" in the Search Box and click
"Search." Results can be filtered using the filtering tools on the
left side of the screen. Click on "Comment Now" to submit public
comments. Click on the "Help" tab on the Regulations.gov home page to
get information on using Regulations.gov, including instructions for submitting
public comments. Or one can e-mail: regs.comments@occ.treas.gov.
The bond markets are closed
today, which obviously includes mortgage-backed securities, which help set rate
sheet prices. Interesting, with the debt crisis and partial shutdown, rates
were little changed last week. The budget and debt ceiling discussions will
still move the markets this week. If the shutdown is not resolved, most of the
economic reports scheduled for this week will be postponed, including the
Consumer Price Index, Industrial Production, and Housing Starts. Unaffected by
the shutdown, the Fed's Beige Book will be released on Wednesday and the Philly
Fed index will come out on Thursday. Mortgage markets will be closed on Monday
in observance of Columbus Day.
What economic news will be
released this week? I don't know, just like I don't know why Federal politicians
should continue to be paid, or even have air conditioning, during this
shutdown. Actually, unlike last week, many of the scheduled economic reports
are not at the mercy of the government which will provide some information to
investors about how the economy is looking. Data that will be reported include
the Empire State Survey (Tuesday); MBA applications, Beige Book, NAHB house
price index (Wednesday); Initial Claims, Industrial Production & Capacity
Utilization and Philly Fed (Thursday); and Leading Indicators (Friday);
Wednesday's CPI is the only report that is dependent upon a fully functioning
government. As mentioned, the bond market is closed, so setting rates is a
little more touchy-feely than normal, and look for conservative rate sheets.
Here is some "late-breaking
news": Christopher Columbus might not have been such a wonderful human
being: AProductOfHisTime? Quite the
opposite.
No comments:
Post a Comment