The Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau (CFPB) and the Department of Justice (DOJ), after an
investigation that begin in early 2014, announced a joint action against Hudson City
Savings Bank for discriminatory redlining practices that denied
residents in majority-Black-and-Hispanic neighborhoods fair access to mortgage
loans. The complaint filed by the CFPB and DOJ alleges that Hudson City
illegally provided unequal access to credit to neighborhoods in New York, New
Jersey, Connecticut, and Pennsylvania. The bank located branches and loan
officers, selected mortgage brokers, and marketed products to avoid and thereby
discourage prospective borrowers in predominantly Black and Hispanic
communities. If the proposed consent order is approved by the court, Hudson
City will pay $25 million in direct loan subsidies to qualified borrowers in
the affected communities, $2.25 million in community programs and outreach, and
a $5.5 million penalty. This represents the largest redlining settlement in
history to provide such direct subsidies.
The Equal Credit
Opportunity Act (ECOA) prohibits creditors from discriminating against
applicants in credit transactions on the basis of characteristics such as race,
color, and national origin. In the complaint, the CFPB and DOJ alleged that
from at least 2009 to 2013, Hudson City violated the law when it engaged in
illegal redlining by offering unequal access to credit based on the race and
ethnicity of prospective borrowers' neighborhoods. Specifically, Hudson
City structured its business to avoid and thereby discourage residents in
majority-Black-and-Hispanic neighborhoods from accessing mortgages. The DOJ
also alleges that Hudson violated the Fair Housing Act, which also prohibits
discrimination in residential mortgage lending.
Remember that last week the
CFPB also took legal action against World Law Group.
The lawsuit against World Law names individuals responsible for running a
debt-relief scheme that charged consumers exorbitant illegal upfront fees. The
CFPB alleges the debt-relief scheme falsely promised consumers a team of
attorneys to help negotiate debt settlements with creditors, failed to provide
legal representation, and rarely settled consumers' debts.
No, the CFPB has not
been sitting on its hands. Using enforcement actions to effectively run an
entire industry is not a good way to run residential lending, and everyone is
certainly waiting for "another head to be put on a stake on the castle
wall" regarding MSAs. That being said, the CFPB issued a final rule
amending threshold adjustments for 2016 HOEPA and QM loans, effective January
1st, 2016. The final rule regarding
various annual adjustments is required to make under provisions of Regulation Z
(TILA) that implement the CARD Act, HOEPA, and the ability to repay/qualified
mortgage provisions of Dodd-Frank. The adjustments made by the final rule
are effective January 1, 2016. The revised loan amount threshold for HOEPA
loans is $20,350 and the adjusted statutory fee trigger is $1,017.
HOEPA requires the CFPB
to annually adjust the total loan amount thresholds that determines whether a
transaction is a high cost mortgage when the points and fees are either 5
percent or 8 percent of such amount. In the final rule, the CFPB
decreased the current dollar thresholds from, respectively, $20,391 to $20,350
and $1,020 to $1,017.
And helping every
borrower better shop their lender (I didn't say that!), "As part of our
Know Before You Owe mortgage initiative there is now a Loan Estimate that makes
shopping for a mortgage easier than ever. The Loan Estimate uses
clear language and design to help you understand the key features, costs, and
risks of a loan offer you've received from a lender. Starting October 3,
lenders will give you the Loan Estimate for most mortgages you apply for. The
new design also makes it easier to compare Loan Estimates. Shopping for the
best deal on your mortgage could save you money over the years. You should get
Loan Estimates from at least three lenders and compare them to find the loan
that's best for you and your family."
The CFPB also issued a rule that will increase the number
of financial institutions that are able to offer certain types of mortgages in
rural and underserved areas. "The rule also gives small
creditors time to adjust their business practices to comply with the new
rules. We will update some of the Title XIV implementation materials on
our website to reflect the changes, and will send an email to let you know when
we have posted those updates." Yes, it issued a final rule that revises
the definitions of "small creditor" and "rural areas" under
Regulation Z of the Truth in Lending Act (TILA). The final rule is effective
January 1, 2016 and creates special small creditor provisions with regard to
certain Regulation Z requirements. Certain provisions apply to small creditors
in general, while other provisions apply to small creditors that operate
predominantly in rural or undeserved areas.
Additionally, the annual
percentage rate ceiling for a first lien loan to be a non-higher priced
mortgage loan that is eligible for the qualified mortgage safe harbor under the
ATR rule is higher for small creditors than other creditors (i.e., less than
3.5 percentage points above a benchmark rate as opposed to less than 1.5
percentage points above the benchmark rate). To increase the number of
financial institutions eligible for these special provisions under Regulation
Z, the final rule revises the definition of "small creditor" by
increasing the loan origination limit for determining eligibility for
small-creditor status from 500 originations of covered transactions secured by
a first lien to 2,000 originations. Significantly, originated loans held in
portfolio by the creditor and its affiliates are excluded from the 2,000 loan
cap.
In addition it includes
the assets of the creditor's affiliates that regularly extended covered
transactions in the calculation of the $2 billion asset limit for
small-creditor status. The CFPB took this step to prevent larger creditors from
attempting to fit within the small creditor provisions through organizational
changes. It also expands the definition of "rural area" to include
either: (a) a county that meets the current definition of a rural county; or
(b) a census block that is not in an urban area as defined by the U.S. Census
Bureau. Additionally, the rule allows creditors to rely on a new automated tool
provided on the CFPB website to determine whether properties are located in
rural or underserved areas, or on the Census Bureau's website to assess whether
a particular property is located in an urban area (based on the Census Bureau's
definition). For more details definitely click on the link a few paragraphs up!
The CFPB updated two
regulatory examination procedures, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (88 pages) and
the Truth in Lending Act
(323 pages). Yes, 323 pages of simplification.