(Thanks to GB for this one; warning - Rated
PG I guess.)
A guy goes to the supermarket and notices
an attractive woman waving at him. She says hello. He's rather taken aback
because he can't place where he knows her from.
So he asks, "Do you know me?"
To which she replies, "I think you're
the father of one of my kids."
Now his mind travels back to the only time
he has ever been unfaithful to his wife and says, "Are you the stripper
from the bachelor party that I made love to on the pool table with all my
buddies watching while your partner whipped my back with wet celery???"
She looks into his eyes and says calmly,
"No, I'm your son's teacher."
Here's a letter that, as a lender, you probably don't want to
receive from the CFPB. Remember that the CFPB runs HMDA now, and fired this shot across the bow to 44 lenders. "The
letters say that recipients should review their practices to ensure they comply
with all relevant laws. The companies are encouraged to respond to the Bureau
to advise if they have taken, or will take, steps to ensure compliance with the
law." (I was unable to pull up the actual letter - must be my computer.)
In terms of products, FormFree's founder and CEO Brent Chandler writes, "Rep
and warrant relief for automated income and asset verification through The Work
Number and AccountChek is a signal to the industry that
the paper-based era of mortgage lending is coming to an end. Mortgage
technology has finally evolved to the point that lenders can base their
decisions on direct-access data - untouched by human hands - and be relatively
protected against buyback requests by doing so. This announcement is the
culmination of an extensive pilot with Fannie Mae, and to be the first
announced preferred provider for automated asset verification is simply
phenomenal."
What have recent 3rd quarter earnings
announcements from those feisty private mortgage insurance companies told us
about industry trends?
MGIC Investment Corp. beat some estimates due to
lower incurred losses driven by positive reserve development and higher net
premiums earned. NIW (new insurance written) was strong at $14.2 billion vs.
$12.4 billion a year ago, and book value increased to $7.48 from $7.37 in 2Q.
Net premiums earned was $237 million with what looks to be an average premium
margin of 53 basis points. MGIC's single premium percentage fell to 18% from
21% in 2Q. Incurred losses were $60.9 million, up from $46.6 million last
quarter and down from $76.5 million in 3Q15. Paid claims fell to $161 million
from $172 million in 2Q16. Management expects to generate NIW of $46 billion in
2016, and IIF (insurance in force) is expected to grow by 4-5% this year, vs.
previous expectations of 5% growth. Management noted that it has not seen any
signs of market share shifts given ACGL's acquisition of UG, but expects
opportunities to arise once the deal closes. The company noted its market share
for 3Q was 17-18%.
Radian Group Inc. did well also and saw
higher net premiums earned, partially offset by a higher loss provision, than
analysts were expecting. The higher net premiums earned were because of NIW and
IIF both ahead of forecasts. In terms of credit (mortgage insurance), the loss
ratio came in at 23.6%, paid claims came in at $83 million, and the loss
reserve fell to $822 million from $848 million. Net premiums earned of $238
million, NIW was $15.7 billion (up from $12.9 billion in 2Q and up from $11.2
billion Y/Y), and single premium rose to 27% from 26% in 2Q. It appears that
Radian's average premium margin was also about 53 basis points. Premium revenue
was stronger than anticipated, driven by a benefit from accelerated single
premium revenue recognition, while losses incurred were weaker due to a smaller
benefit from reserve adjustments. Most notably, new insurance written was up
40% year over year, better than 15% growth for MTG, and driving acceleration in
the pace of insurance-in-force expansion.
Yesterday the commentary discussed collateral and
appraisals, and reminded readers about the Five C's of Credit: capacity,
capital, collateral, conditions and character. Let's see what's going on
with capacity with a slight twist - do borrowers have the equity?
LOs know that when it comes to financing residential real
estate, no two transactions are the same. For that matter, no two borrowers are
the same. This is especially true when it comes to financing properties with
less than 20 percent equity or less than 20 percent down payment.
For many years, having less than 20 percent equity in a property
meant that the borrowers were forced to encounter less than desirable financing
options. For a long period, the only viable financing options for such
scenarios were loans with a mandatory mortgage insurance premium.
During the past year or so, more financing options are
becoming available for such scenarios as Fannie and Freddie have joined the FHA
in offering low down payment 97% LTV programs. But they aren't catching on. It
should be noted, however, that mortgage insurance premiums are now more
favorable, less expensive and in some instances, even tax deductible.
Nonetheless, it is encouraging to see that other options are now available in
the current market place.
Now, borrowers with less than the 20 percent equity mark
can finance properties with a second loan in lieu of mortgage insurance. What
may make this option more appealing is that the second loan can now be
structured as a standard 30-year fixed rate mortgage. A financing option such
as this is more appealing to some borrowers. In many such instances, both the
first and second loans in place can both be a standard fixed rate mortgage with
the monthly payments of both loans going toward principal and interest with the
mortgage interest paid on both loans being tax deductible in many scenarios.
There are differences between the old 100% CLTV programs
of 10-20 years ago. But financing with two fixed-rate loans such as this offers
the appeal of being in a more traditional type of financing structure without
having a mortgage insurance premium in place. The second loan can be paid down
or off without penalty as finances permit. Combined 30-year fixed financing
such as this can be used for primary and secondary homes alike and is available
to most property types. Processors and LOs know that some scenarios with less
than 20 percent equity may be better suited for financing with mortgage
insurance and vice versa.
Possibly refinancing a first or obtaining a second, given
appreciating markets, isn't new. Let's go back to the end of 2015 when Black
Knight released its Mortgage Monitor report, analyzing data through November
2015. Highlights of the report included that there were currently 5.2 million
borrowers who could qualify and benefit from refinancing, which was down from 7
million in April 2015 when rates were less than 3.7 percent. Of these 5.2
million borrowers, almost 2.4 million could save $200 or more each month and
1.9 million could save anywhere from $100-$200 per month. Rates are close to
the same as the end of 2015, but if rates rise by half a percent, then 2.1
million borrowers would no longer benefit from a refinance and 3.1 million
borrowers would also be out if rates increase by 1 percent.
At that time Black Knight told us that the amount of
equity that homeowners could tap into is $4.2 trillion, up $600 billion over
the last year, and about 37 million borrowers have an average of $112,000 in
equity. And most markets have appreciated since then! Most of the equity (38
percent) that is accessible is in California alone and 51 percent of
"tappable" equity is tied to first lien mortgages with rates below 4
percent. But lenders also know that plenty of those loans have loan level
price adjustments that make the actual pricing worse than current rates,
lessening the appeal of refinancing, thus investors have not seen a huge wave
of refinancing of them.
What about the flip side - a lack of capacity and LTV
available to refinance? Negative equity is when homeowners with a mortgage owed
more than their homes were worth. Zillow's negative equity report found that
nationally, 12.7% of homeowners fell into this category, which is significantly
better than the high of 31.4% in Q1 2012. Chicago is the new leader, replacing
Las Vegas in the large housing market with the highest rate of negative equity
at 20.3%. The Bay Area has the lowest rates of negative equity among large
markets. San Jose and San Francisco are the only two large metros with negative
equity below 5%.
The percentage of homeowners in negative equity has been
on a steady decline, driven by a consistent recovery in home values. As
negative equity overall continues to fall, the epicenter of underwater
homeowners in the U.S. has shifted from the notoriously hard-hit - but quick to
recover - Southwest and Southeast, to the long-suffering and sluggish rust belt
states and even New Jersey. The shift is reflective of a housing market that
has evolved from one driven by largely temporary factors caused by the massive
housing boom and bust, to one driven by more fundamental, traditional factors
like job growth, supply and demand."
And what about those that want to buy bank-owned
properties? Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.A. (NASDAQ: ASPS),
a leading provider of real estate, mortgage and technology services, polled 100
mortgage servicing professionals in attendance at the recent Five Star
Conference and Expo in Dallas, the nation's largest gathering of mortgage
servicing professionals. The poll finds that participants are optimistic that
continued low interest rates will encourage home buying (44 percent) and new
financing options from lenders will broaden the buyer pool (39 percent).
The survey indicates that respondents believe offering more
financing options to home buyers for auction properties (38 percent) will be a
factor in attracting a more consumer-based audience, followed by over a
third of respondents (34 percent) who say education about the auction market
and the use of real estate agents to promote auction properties (34 percent)
will be needed to attract consumer interest in purchasing REO homes.
Furthermore, 28 percent of respondents view having access to more robust market
data and insights as the most important aspect to make the greatest impact in
the REO market.
"The bank-owned real estate sector was largely
untapped by individual home buyers until recently," said John A. Vella,
chief revenue officer of Altisource. "Today, individual buyers can benefit
from smart financing options like rehab financing, otherwise known as a FHA
203(k) loan, which bundles the home purchase price and renovation costs into a
single mortgage. This is a huge step in the right direction because it can help
buyers purchase affordable properties from the REO market, especially at a time
when inventory is low and housing prices are continuing to climb."
Yes, rates have slowly been moving higher. This week's
move, taking the 10-year back up to yields we last saw in late May, has been
attributed to solid economic news out of the United Kingdom (were all those
Brexit fears misplaced?), continued decent news out of the United States, and
the increasing odds of a Fed increase in short-term rates way off in December.
Fortunately, the NY Fed is continuing to buy agency MBS to the tune of about $2
billion a day using money from early pay-offs. By the end of the day yesterday
the 10-year had worsened .5 in price, to close at a yield of 1.84%, and agency
MBS prices worsened .125-.250 depending on security and coupon.
For thrills and chills today we've already had the first
look at Q3 GDP (+2.9%, higher than expected) and the Q3 Employment Cost Index
(+.6%). Coming up is a 2nd tier number: The University of Michigan
Sentiment Index for October which is expected to increase slightly. After
the first volley of strong numbers the 10-year is yielding 1.87% with agency
MBS prices worse .125.