(Why does this sound like
managers I know...)
The owner of a company
tells his employees, "You worked very hard this year, therefore the
company's profits increased dramatically. As a reward, I 'm giving everyone a
check for $5,000!"
Thrilled, the employees gather round and high five one another.
"And if you work with the same zeal next year, I'll sign those checks!"
Thrilled, the employees gather round and high five one another.
"And if you work with the same zeal next year, I'll sign those checks!"
Are you sure that you want to keep originating FHA loans?
There's a lot of profit per loan, but it is easy to see why some companies like
Chase have really pulled back from originating them. Branch Banking & Trust
Company, a unit of BB&T Corp, is the latest in a growing list of companies
smacked by fines, and will pay $83 million to settle charges that it originated and underwrote
federally insured mortgages that did not meet federal requirements. The U.S.
Justice Department said that BB&T, as a "direct endorsement
lender" in the FHA's mortgage insurance program, failed to comply with FHA
origination, underwriting and quality control requirements.
CalyxSoftware will host its first national user conference, ASCEND16, next week, October 5 - 8, 2016 at the Hyatt
Regency New Orleans. ASCEND16 will feature more than 20 specialized breakout
sessions for Point, PointCentral, PathSoftware, and LoanScoreCard customers and
prospects. Scheduled speakers include representatives from the CFPB, Fannie
Mae, Freddie Mac and Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA), as well as Shark
Tank's Barbara Corcoran and Yahoo! Tech columnist David Pogue.
On October 13th, AMLG and TMC are
hosting a Complimentary Webinar on "Fair Lending: What You Need to Know in
2016." Click here to register.
California MBA is offering a free
webinar on Mobil Marketing. This October 19th training has limited
availability; register now.
ACI's 22nd National Residential Mortgage Forum San
Diego Installment: The industry's leading litigators and in-house counsel are
meeting in San Diego on January 11-12, 2017. Attend to benchmark your current
strategies, learn the latest government enforcement and regulatory priorities,
and get judicial insights from top State judges and Federal judges. Click here
to view the Agenda for Jan. 11th-12th.
Yay! "The new HMDA data is out! The new HMDA data is out!"
Well, the 2015 HMDA data is out. Have at it!
Yes, the 2015 raw origination data from the Home Mortgage
Disclosure Act (HMDA) was just released yesterday, and Richey May has
already organized it into a dynamic, interactive dashboard that is available
free of charge on their website for the next year. As Q3 comes to a close
and you look towards strategically planning for Q4 and 2017, lenders will find
this dashboard valuable for identifying new markets for expansion, seeking out
M&A opportunities, measuring the success of sales efforts and more. With a
few clicks, you can focus in on the data most relevant to you, including specific
markets, lenders and product types. And did I mention it's free? Visit this dashboard and others here.
In a notice published in the Federal Register, the CFPB
announced that it has given its "official approval" to the collection
of expanded Home Mortgage Disclosure Act information on ethnicity and race in
2017. The amendments to Regulation C (which implements HMDA)
finalized in 2015 will require financial institutions covered by HMDA to permit
applicants to self-identify using disaggregated ethnic and racial categories
beginning January 1, 2018. In the notice, the CFPB stated that before
such date, such inquiries would not be allowed under Regulation B Section
1002.5(a)(2) which limits inquiries by creditors about race or other protected
characteristics.
Believing there will be significant benefits to permitting
creditors to ask consumers to self-identify before January 1, 2018, the CFPB
gave approval for a creditor "at any time from January 1, 2017, through
December 31, 2017...at its option, [to] permit applicants to self-identify
using disaggregated ethnic and racial categories as instructed in appendix B to
Regulation C, as amended by the 2015 HMDA final rule." A creditor
adopting that practice "shall not be deemed to violate" Section
1002.5(a)(2) and "shall also be deemed to be in compliance with Regulation
B § 1002.5(a)(2) even though applicants are asked to self-identify using
categories other than those explicitly provided in that section."
The notice also includes instructions for creditors to use to
submit information concerning ethnicity and race collected under the
approval in connection with applications received from January 1, 2017
through December 31, 2017. The instructions distinguish between
applications on which final action is taken during the 2017 calendar year and
those on which final action is taken on or after January 1, 2018.
For applications on which final action is taken during the 2017
calendar year, a financial institution is directed to submit the information on
ethnicity and race using only the aggregate categories and codes provided in
the filing instructions guide for HMDA data collected in 2017, even if the
financial institution has permitted applicants to self-identify using
disaggregated categories pursuant to the approval. For applications on
which final action is taken on or after January 1, 2018, a financial
institution is given the option to submit the information on ethnicity and race
using disaggregated categories if the applicant provided such information
instead of using the transition rule adopted by the 2015 HMDA final rule or to
submit the information using the transition rule.
In the notice published in the Federal Register, the CFPB also
announced that it has given its "official approval" to a revised and redesigned
Uniform Residential Loan Application (2016 URLA). The 2016 URLA approved by the
CFPB was issued by Freddie and Fannie, and is included as an attachment to the
CFPB's notice. The notice indicates that the CFPB's staff has determined
that the relevant language in the 2016 URLA complies with the provisions in
Regulation B (which implements the ECOA) that limit requests by creditors for
certain information in applications, such as information about race and other
protected characteristics, a spouse, marital status, or income from alimony and
certain other sources. The CFPB stated that while a creditor's use of the
2016 URLA is not required under Regulation B, a creditor that uses the 2016
URLA without any modification that would violate these Regulation B provisions
would be in compliance with such provisions.
The CFPB noted that a version of the URLA dated January 2004 is
included in appendix B to Regulation B as a model form and describes the safe
harbor provided in appendix B for creditors that use the model form. The
CFPB also noted that the Official Staff Commentary to Regulation B provides
that creditors can use a previous version of the URLA dated October 1992
without violating Regulation B. The CFPB stated that its official approval
"is being issued separately from, and without amending" the Official
Staff Commentary and that it will consider whether to address the treatment of
outdated versions of the URLA in the Commentary at a later date.
Franklin American Mortgage Company's (FAMC) TILA policy
requires delivery of two copies of the rescission notice (a/k/the right to
cancel) to each individual who has an ownership interest in a subject property
at the time of closing. In the scenario where an individual with ownership
interest in a subject property is being voluntarily removed from the title,
FAMC is updating its policy to accept the following documentation in lieu of
the right to cancel disclosure: Executed Quit Claim Deed or other instrument
removing ownership interest signed and recorded prior to the security
instrument. If the document is executed at closing, the lender must
ensure that the instrument removing ownership is signed and recorded prior to
the security instrument.
Over 40 percent of American homebuyers feel taken advantage of
or are confused by the calculation of title insurance fees on the Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau's (CFPB) new mortgage disclosures, according to a new study by the American Land Title Association (ALTA). The survey,
which polled 2,000 current and prospective homeowners (planning to buy within
the next year), revealed that that over 30 percent of homebuyers find the new
Closing Disclosure confusing. More troubling, another 10 percent of homebuyers
feel taken advantage of when reviewing the current calculation of an owner's
title insurance policy on the Closing Disclosure. According to ALTA's survey,
the most important factor homeowners want on their Closing Disclosure is a
detailed breakdown of all the costs for a service. Secondly, consumers want the
ability to easily compare cost estimates to final fees on the disclosure.
Third, homeowners want to compare the disclosures to the actual costs they will
pay and confirm that the seller is paying the accurate amount.
Yes, I have reviewed
more than a few Procedures and Protocols over the past few years. To be
honest, I believe most Secondary Marketing departments get it wrong; I'll
explain. While P&P's are usually written by individuals who come at it from
a "what do auditors want to see" position, this is really only half
the reason this departmental document is an important part of risk and
compliance mitigation. P&Ps should be used to eliminate confusion, create
structure and to enforce standards established by executives or regulatory
bodies. It's the departments chance to put down in writing, the how's and
why's, and to address the inherent risks associated with pricing, hedging and
selling loans.
Good departmental
P&P's have many things in common: they illustrate daily tasks in an easy to
follow manner (an excellent resource for new hires), note why a particular task
is important to the department, and use a standardized format. Also, I know
someone who reviews these manuals for mortgage bankers, and agree a third party
review of P&Ps can be a good use of time and money, especially for small
originators attempting to write them from scratch. For bigger companies,
establishing an inter-department review process (example: Post Close reviews
Secondary's, and vice versa) is a great use of time as well.
Interest rates aren't doing much, nor is there any impetus for
them to move much. Fixed-income prices spent most of Thursday in negative
territory until more bad news for Deutsche Bank caused a flight to quality to
U.S. government bonds. The particular bad news today was that 10 hedge funds
had reduced their collateral for clearing derivatives trades, thus reducing
their exposure to Deutsche Bank, sparking renewed fears of a modern-day bank
run and sending the American depository receipts down. Throw that in with
continued Wells Fargo news, and, well...
So Thursday the good ol' 10-year improved about .125 to end the
day at 1.56%; agency MBS prices finished about unchanged.
Today we have a fair amount of scheduled news. China released
its Manufacturing PMI for September - if you care to trust those numbers. We've
had Personal Income and Spending/Consumption for August (+.2%, unchanged,
respectively). The Core PCE deflator was tame. Coming up are September's
Chicago Purchasing Manager's Survey and the University of Michigan Sentiment
Index. The 10-year yield is currently 1.55% with agency MBS prices a shade
better.